In April 2019, this article was published as part of the IR Global & ACC:

QUESTION ONE

What is your best practice approach when advising General Counsel, to ensure dispute resolution clauses are to their real advantage and do not obstruct enforcement proceedings?

There are a number of formal requirements for an arbitration agreement:

An arbitration agreement must sufficiently specify the parties (they must at least be determinable), it must also sufficiently specify the subject matter of the dispute in relation to a defined legal relationship (this must at least be determinable and it can be limited to certain disputes, or include all disputes).

The agreement must sufficiently specify the parties’ intent to have the dis- pute decided by arbitration, thereby excluding the state courts’ compe- tence; and be contained either in a written document signed by the parties, or in telefaxes, e-mails or other communications exchanged between the parties, which preserve evidence of a contract.

A clear reference to general terms and conditions containing an arbitration clause is sufficient.

In certain circumstances an arbitration agreement is no longer enforcea- ble. These include arbitration agreements and clauses that can be chal- lenged under the general principles of Austrian contract law, in particular on the grounds of error, deceit or duress, or legal incapacity. There is controversy over whether such a challenge should be brought before the arbitral tribunal, or before a court of law. If the parties to a contract con- taining an arbitration clause rescind their contract, the arbitration clause is deemed to be no longer enforceable, unless the parties have expressly agreed on the continuation of the arbitration clause. In the event of insol- vency or death, the receiver or legal successor is, in general, bound by the arbitration agreement. An arbitral agreement is no longer enforceable if an arbitral tribunal has rendered an award on the merits of the case, or if a court of law has rendered a final judgment on the merits and the decision covers all matters for which arbitration has been agreed on.

 

QUESTION TWO

Are there any particular rules around funding litigation in your jurisdiction that General Counsel should be aware of?

There are no specific provisions in Austrian legislation, however, profes- sional conduct regulations do not allow for lawyers to be paid on the basis of contingency fees only; thus any funding agreement that directly or indirectly results in such a model is not available to legal practitioners.

On the other hand, the Austrian Supreme Court approved litigation funding by a third-party in a 2013 decision (OGH, 6 Ob 224/12b). In addition, in 2004 and 2012, the Vienna Commercial Court denied the defendants’ objections to third-party funding of the respective claims.

Thus, today, litigation funding in Austria is accepted and has been judi- cially endorsed by Austrian court practice. Although the courts did not comprehensively cover all aspects involved, they established in Austria an unquestioned and favorable environment for third-party litigation funding.

 

QUESTION THREE 

What techniques are typically used by international counterparties in your experience when attempting to gain the initiative during a dispute? How important are civil procedural rules?

Sometimes, even the best preparation cannot prevent determined counsel from using measures that are inappropriate, offensive, unethical and may result in the proceedings being derailed.

In order to tackle any such attempts, a step-by-step approach is advisable:

  • request interim (procedural) measures (preserving documents, delivery of the requested documents, security for costs)
  • suggest negative or adverse inferences (e.g. negative assessment of the behavior at the evidence stage)
  • ask for to penalisation by cost sanctions, reporting unethical behaviour to arbitral institutions or bar associations, ex-parte awards and exclu- sion of abusive counsel
Our website uses cookies. These are small text files that are stored on your device using the browser. They do no harm. We use cookies to make our service user-friendly. Some cookies remain stored on your device until you delete them. They allow us to recognize your browser on your next visit. If you do not want this, you can set up your browser so that it informs you about the setting of cookies and you allow this only in individual cases.
I understand